Mitchell Krueger vs Alfredo Perez Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 10 Sep at 04:42 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Krueger vs A. Perez

USA
2
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Krueger 2 - 0 Perez
They have played 4 sets in total, with Mitchell Krueger winning 4 and Alfredo Perez winning 0. The last match between Mitchell Krueger and Alfredo Perez was at the Winston-Salem Challenger, 10-09-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Mitchell Krueger getting the victory 6-4 7-6(5).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Krueger | 2 |
| Perez | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R2) Winston-Salem Challenger(09-10-25)
(R1) Fairfield Challenger(10-10-23)
M. Krueger vs A. Perez H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,082,108 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 52.35% (445-405) | Career Total W/L | 63.96% (236-133) |
| 2 | Hard | 0 |
| 9 | Titles | 2 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 25.00% (1-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Krueger vs A. Perez Match Preview:
- Recently, Perez has secured 44.48% of second-serve points, while Krueger has a slight edge at 47.06%.
- In returning second serves, Perez claims 45.33% compared to Krueger's marginally better 45.78%.
- First serve return stats are almost identical: Perez at 26.28% and Krueger at 26.29%—who will this minor difference in performance favor?
- Under pressure, Perez saves 52.13% of breakpoints, with Krueger saving a slightly higher 53.25%.
- Looking at match wins over the last year, Perez is stronger with a win rate of 67.86%, while Krueger stands at 40.35%.
- Hard courts seem best suited to Perez with a 65% win rate; meanwhile, Krueger excels on clay with a 56% win rate.
- Perez has shone in lower-level Futures/Satellites, winning 73.81% of matches, whereas Krueger's experience is more with Challengers, winning 44.83%.
- In head-to-head matchups, Krueger leads, having defeated Perez in their only encounter.
- The average match time between them is 1:31:23, but a deciding set has not been played—will this match be the first to stretch that far?
- In tiebreaks, Krueger has the advantage with a 1-0 record against Perez.
- Recently, Perez faces players ranked around 374, while Krueger's opponents average a rank of 222.75.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Perez wins 68% of such challenges, outperforming Krueger's 45% success rate.
- In break point opportunities, Krueger shows more prowess, converting 31.33%, over Perez's 26.15%.
Editorial Prediction (September 10, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing second-serve performance, first serve returns, and tiebreak success, Krueger subtly outperforms Perez, contributing to a competitive edge.
While Perez demonstrates higher match win statistics over the last year, Krueger displays more resilience against higher-ranked opponents.
Factoring in previous direct match results, surface preferences, and breakpoint conversion rates, Krueger seems to possess the upper hand.
Therefore, despite Perez's potential in deciding set scenarios, Krueger’s comprehensive stats favor him as the likely victor in this upcoming match.
Mitchell Krueger vs Alfredo Perez Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Krueger vs A. Perez H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 26 | Games Won | 18 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:55:10 | Average Match Time | 1:55:10 |
| 68% (90/133) | 1st Serve % | 70% (96/138) |
| 74% (67/90) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (61/96) |
| 60% (26/43) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (23/42) |
| 42% (5/12) | Break Pts Won % | 29% (2/7) |
| 39% (54/138) | Return Points Win % | 30% (40/133) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Krueger Recent Matches Played
A. Perez Recent Matches Played

M. Krueger vs A. Perez Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.35% (445/405) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.96% (236/133) |
| 52.52% (1053/952) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.48% (518/311) |
| 51.03% (9790/9394) | Games Win/Loss | 55.64% (4314/3439) |
| 53.56% (278/241) | Hard Win/Loss | 64.26% (151/84) |
| 56.11% (124/97) | Clay Win/Loss | 64.37% (56/31) |
| 40.24% (33/49) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61.70% (29/18) |
| 35.71% (10/18) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 2960 | Aces Total | 1090 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1720 | Total Double Faults | 609 |
| 1:23:57 | Average Match Time | 1:20:4 |
| 532.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 431.64 |
| 62% (30676/49571) | 1st Serve % | 63% (11847/18749) |
| 69% (21193/30676) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (8263/11847) |
| 51% (9579/18895) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3542/6902) |
| 41% (1857/4518) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (865/2002) |
| 38% (19182/50075) | Return Points Win % | 41% (7954/19300) |
| 46.03% (29/34) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 36.36% (12/21) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48.00% (36/39) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 49.18% (241/249) | Challenger W/L | 56.57% (56/43) |
| 67.20% (127/62) | Futures W/L | 66.91% (180/89) |
| 52% (434/833) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (233/364) |
| 55% (6/11) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 46% (132/290) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (48/103) |
| 45% (133/296) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (46/94) |
| 81% (453/368) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (237/214) |
| 19% (453/85) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (237/22) |
| 18% (397/73) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (132/22) |